Former
Congresswoman Gabby Gifford’s presentation at the Senate hearing on gun safety
was remarkable. Her courage and determination to recover, in so far as is
possible, after being shot in the head by a mentally deranged young man brought
a tear to my eye. And the obvious pride
on her husband’s face as she was making her presentation was inspiring.
With that
being said, I never thought watching a Senate Committee on gun safety and listening
to those testifying against gun safety laws would be so entertaining!
First we
had Wayne LaPierre make the mind-boggling statement that it was pointless to
have background checks for gun purchasers at gun shows and between individuals
because criminals would never submit to background checks. Assuming, of course, that there would be
enforcement of the new law, isn’t that what this is all about? If the criminal doesn’t submit to the
background check, he, or she, doesn’t get to buy a gun! That is the whole point! We all know that there will be a black market
for guns but at least the criminals will have to pay a great deal more for an
assault weapon, and will have to go to some trouble to get one. But this will also keep them out of the hands
of other people who really shouldn’t have one.
After
LaPierre’s testimony we got to listen to Gayle Trotter’s testimony about how
guns really make women safer. Never mind
that the majority of women who are killed, are done in by someone they know
well, and that someone has access to the gun that is already in the house. But Trotter had a scenario, apparently made
up since she cited no documentation to support it, of the woman with children who
is home alone with them, and 4-5 intruders come into to her house. She wouldn’t have enough bullets in just a
regular gun to kill all of them.
So let’s
carry this thing a tad further. In order
to have easy access to her AR-15, it would need to be close at hand and loaded
so that when the intruders “intrude”, she is loaded and ready to shoot since
most intruders don’t make appointments. Now how old are these children? Boys, as soon
as they reach the age of thought, are fascinated by guns. You may notice that I did not say, “age of
reason”. So let’s assume, since we are
making this scenario up that there are boys in the house between the ages of 5
to 15. Thus, there will be a loaded and
ready to shoot AR-15 within easy access.
And if they are all girls, has anyone just assumed the girls are not
interested in guns? So boys or girls,
has anyone taken the time to teach the children not to, under any circumstance,
for any reason, touch the AR-15? And
will the children actually listen? Or
has the mother taken appropriate precautions such as dismantling the gun and
putting parts of it in different locations in the house, with the clips in
still another location? And if so, then
it is not loaded and ready to shoot the intruders who didn’t let her know they
were coming.
I can
hardly wait for the next hearings. Nearly
as good as the Comedy Channel.
No comments:
Post a Comment