I have been out of public office now since January, 2007, so
I have had plenty of time to reflect on my years in public service – both the
good and the bad.
The bad part is really something that most people never
think of happening. I’ll start out with the
beginning of a campaign. One organizes,
of course, and hopes one will win. But
the public, including the media, expect you to know everything including the
names of the newest threat to agriculture in the area, including but not
limited to the glassy-winged sharp shooter.
This has nothing to do with guns, by the way. And they question all words that you
say. Also, people will say the most
outrageous things to you as a candidate.
At the end of a rather tiring day years ago as a candidate some lady approached
me and said, “I can’t vote for you because you are related to large
ranchers”. I’m afraid I snapped back
with, “Not really. We all watch our
weight carefully.” I doubt if she
understood, but I felt better.
But, if one manages to get elected, the media and everyone
else assumes that day you have become absolutely, suddenly brilliant, and that
you are perfect. You are treated like
royalty, given special treatment and perks.
Of course, if you happen to be a human and lose your temper, the sky falls. That is unacceptable, especially for a
liberal. Outrage is acceptable for
conservatives.
It is this royal treatment, I think, that is the downfall of
a lot of elected officials. They begin
to believe the hype. And that is
dangerous. Because of this putting up on
a pedestal the elected official believes that whatever he or she does cannot be
wrong. Accepting gifts from constituents
begins to be OK because, after all, you are special. The gifts grow, and I truly believe that when
the public and media find out that these gifts have been accepted and are
outraged, many elected officials are stunned at this. After all, they deserve these gifts. They are special.
I recently gave a small talk to a small group of women about
being in office, and I emphasized that elected officials need to have a have a
rational solid core from which they operate.
Not as an ideologue, but a strong sense of the moral and/or ethical
fitness of actions. How one determines
if a candidate has this core is something I haven’t figured out yet, but it
should be essential.
On 1/6/2007 I was still one of the most brilliant people
around. On 1/8/2007 I had lost all of my
intelligence because I was no longer in office!! This is a little confusing, to say the least,
but since my sense of who I am did not come from being in office, I soon
overcame it. The one thing that I really
missed was my own private, designated parking space in our downtown area. Now that one perk was almost worth all of the
rest!
No comments:
Post a Comment