During the past week we
have all been bombarded, and rightly so, with discussion after discussion on
what to do about the dictator of Syria, Assad, using toxic gas on his own
people. One of my earliest memories is
of a man who lived in what was then the relatively small community of
Chatsworth in the northeast end of the San Fernando Valley in California. This man was neurologically damaged, couldn’t
work, and he and his family had been the recipient of charity until Franklin
Roosevelt got Social Security benefits, and veteran benefits through
congress. I remember the discussions in
the house about how he and his family really did deserve help because he had
been in the army and was gassed in WW I, but that the world had passed treaties
saying countries would never do that again.
And here we are
again. I keep thinking that my life is
on a merry-go-round. I came in to this
world amid turmoil, and I’m getting closer to the end with the same turmoils,
which I foolishly assumed in mid-life had been solved. Foolish me!!
Regardless of that,
last week I stated on this blog that I was glad that I didn’t have to make this
decision because I didn’t have enough information to do so. And I still don’t, but I have had time to
reflect on some things. For starters,
Pope Francis, who I am liking better every day, doesn’t think we should bomb
Syria; that countries need to stop the violence which threatens to involve
other countries, and to ultimately have unintended consequences. There was much more to his letter, of course,
but that is what I took from it for this blog.
It has long seemed to
me that when the United States deals with countries, or peoples, of the
middle-east, we simply do not take into account their culture, and their way of
dealing with problems. I do not mean to
imply that we are right and they are wrong.
It is simply that we approach things from different perspectives. Since I am not a student of the Arabic or
Persian countries, I certainly do not pretend to know how we should. I have learned over the years, however, how
we shouldn’t!
I listened to some of
the Senate Committee hearing the other day, and people there talked a lot about
whether this was a war, a military intervention or strike, a limited action,
and so on. But it generally meant that
air strikes would take place in some manner to degrade the ability of Syria to
use these toxic gasses. I thought about
that a lot, and I came to the conclusion that if I were a Syrian, and I were
being “bombed” by drones, rockets, or whatever, I would not care two figs
whether this was a war, a military strike, a limited action or whatever. I would know that my family and I were being
placed in danger by that big country over there, and heaven forbid that one of
them was killed, I would be a permanent enemy of theirs. Would I know why I was seemingly being
targeted? Would my government explain it
all to me from the perspective of that big country over there, or would my
government put their own spin on why I was being targeted?
And when enough of us
were angry enough, would we then take out our anger on the country that we
believed to be closest to them – Israel?
After all, Israel shares a common border with Syria. What would prevent the Syrians from lobbing a
couple of rockets loaded with toxic gasses, probably Sarin, over into
Israel? That would be the most likely
target because we are too far away. And
since the Syrians know that we are planning something, the bet is that so are
they.
Using the excuse that
me must take some action in Syria because what will other countries think of us
if we don’t is puerile in the extreme.
It harkens back to “what will the neighbors think” if we don’t go to
church on Sundays, or if we don’t mow the lawn, or if our kids aren’t
spotless. So what does it matter what
the neighbors think? What do we think when we look in the mirror every
morning? Do we cringe when we see that
craven face, or are our hearts content, knowing we have done the right thing in
our own eyes, and we would hope, in God’s eyes, regardless of what the
neighbors might think.
No comments:
Post a Comment