Saturday, May 24, 2014

Transitive Verbs and the Death Penalty


When I first got into politics years ago, the current mantra from those with a more conservative viewpoint in my county was that we “have to protect agriculture.”  That really brought me up short because in my mind “protect” is a transitive verb.  That is, it carries a thought from one side of the noun over to the other side.  Therefore, I kept asking, “Protect agriculture from what, or to do what?”  This didn’t sit well with a lot of people who wanted to protect agriculture’s right to develop the property willy-nilly for development.  But, they didn’t want to say that right out in front of God and everybody, so they hid it in what sounded like a really good thing. 

So, imagine my amusement when I heard a Tea Partier say the other day, quite pompously, “We have to trust people”.  That sounds really good, also, but what are we trusting people to do?  To further restrict women’s access to health care?  Restrict voting?  Even cutting taxes further for the wealthy and corporations?  We have to be really careful of those transitive verbs and use them correctly, and even more, demand that politicians use them correctly as well.  When you hear stuff like that, don’t assume you know what is meant.  Ask questions, and demand real answers. 

Which brings me to the death penalty.  Years ago when my own kids were quite small, there was a particularly gruesome crime in the San Francisco Bay area.  A man named Greg Abbott kidnapped and killed a little girl.  Or, that was what he was found guilty of doing, and he was eventually electrocuted.  He never confessed.  There was so much media frenzy over this that it even reached down to Fresno.  One of my daughters asked me what the word execution meant, so I was explaining that when a person did a really horrible thing like killing someone, that person was executed which meant that his life was taken away; that he was killed.  She didn’t answer for awhile, then asked, “Who kills that person?”   

Overtime I have given much thought to the subject of the death penalty because of that question, and because of other reasons.  Eventually I have become adamantly opposed to the death penalty.  Now we have the situation wherein much wiser people in Europe are refusing to sell the drugs in the United States that have been used to render the person being executed unconscious in order to administer drugs that will eventually kill him or her.  As a result we have the example of the botched execution in Oklahoma a few weeks ago wherein it took the man 45 minutes to die.  One state is considering bringing back the electric chair, and I believe it is Utah which is considering using a firing squad.   

We have all of these discussions on ways to implement the death penalty, when the subject ought to be why have it at all?  Some arguments are that it is a deterrent, but that doesn’t really stand up to scrutiny.  Others are that some people are so rotten they deserve to die.  Or that they must be gotten off the streets.  The last one is sort of silly because if someone is put in prison without possibility of parole, that certainly gets them off the streets.  The argument that some people are so rotten they deserve to die is the one that most people use.  I find this one the most difficult to explain.  Perhaps they are – but there have been too many people executed that have subsequently turned out to be innocent that the danger of killing even one innocent person ought to be enough to stop using the death penalty.   

But the strongest reason, in my opinion, is what it does to the rest of us.  Our society’s obsession with guns, violence and death are fueled to some degree with our callous disregard about whether a prisoner might be innocent.  And, we hear a lot from the right wing about abortion.  Life starts at conception.  But one of the great secrets of our time is that more main-stream churches, including, for some time now, the Catholic Church, are just as adamantly opposed to the death penalty.  If one is pro-life, then be pro-life.  Stop picking and choosing whose life has more value than someone else’s. 
 
All life has value.

 

 

 

No comments: